Preview

The Collection of Humanitarian Studies

Advanced search

AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION DEVICES: NATIONAL TRAJECTORIES IN XX CENTURY

https://doi.org/10.21626/j-chr/2026-2(47)/4

Abstract

Relevance. This comparative historical study examines the development of technical aids for Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) across ten countries (the USA, Canada, the UK, Sweden, the Netherlands, West Germany, France, the USSR/Russia, Japan, and Czechoslovakia/Poland) between 1920 and 2000. The topic is relevant due to the growing importance of inclusive communica-tion technologies and the need to understand cross-national differences in their histor-ical formation.

Purpose. The aim of the study is to identify national trajectories of AAC tech-nology development, test hypotheses regarding country-specific priorities in device creation, and construct an explanatory model of cross-national differences incorporat-ing institutional and cultural factors.

Materials and methods. The study applies comparative-historical analysis and systema-tization of data on AAC devices, their years of introduction, and target clinical and age groups. A cartogram of national technological trajectories is developed. Four hy-potheses are tested, and a nine-factor explanatory model is constructed using an inter-disciplinary approach supported by structured data analysis.

Results. Four national models are identified: the Anglo-Saxon commercial-educational model, the Scandinavian universal-state model, the Continental medico-associative model, and the Soviet sensor-compensatory model. The Soviet tradition is shown not to have developed specialized AAC devices for motor-speech impair-ments, but it made significant contributions to assistive technologies for visual-hearing impairments and speech rehabilitation in aphasia. The cartogram reveals sta-ble cross-national differences in technological trajectories and priorities.

Conclusion. The study demonstrates that theoretical and methodological frameworks of national special education systems significantly influence technologi-cal priorities in AAC development, with an impact comparable to that of legislation and funding mechanism.

About the Authors

K. V. Shelepin
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Neurotechnologies, FSBI NMRC PN named after V.P. Serbsky MH of Russia
Russian Federation

Konstantin Y. Shelepin – PhD in Medical Sciences, Director

119034, 23 Kropotkinsky Lane, Moscow

 



D. A. Naumova
National Research University Higher School of Economics
Russian Federation

Diana A. Naumova – Student

101000, 20 Myasnitskaya Street, Moscow



E. Y. Shelepin
I. P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Evgeny Y. Shelepin – Researcher, Laboratory of Speech Psychophysiology 

199034, 6 Makarova Embankment, Saint Petersburg



K. S. Skuratova
I. P. Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Ksenia A. Skuratova – Junior Researcher, Laboratory of Visual Physiology 

199034, 6 Makarova Embankment, Saint Petersburg

 



References

1. Basilova, T. A. Teoreticheskaya razrabotka i prakticheskaya realizatsiya sistemy obucheniya slepoglukhikh A. I. Meshcheryakovym (k 85-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya) / T. A. Basilova // Kul’turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya. 2008. Vol. 4, no. 3. P. 51–58.

2. Bitova, A. L. Kontseptsiya razvitiya sistemy al’ternativnoy i dopolni-tel’noy kommunikatsii v Rossiyskoy Federatsii do 2030 goda / A. L. Bitova, M. V. Pereverzeva, I. N. Tekotskaya [et al.] // Obrazovatel’naya politika. 2024. No. 3 (99). Tekst : electronic // CyberLeninka. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kontseptsiya-razvitiya-sistemy-alternativnoy-i-dopolnitelnoy-kommunikatsii-v-rossiyskoy-federatsii-do-2030-goda (accessed: 27.02.2026).

3. Vygotsky, L. S. Myshlenie i rech’: sbornik / L. S. Vygotsky. Moscow : AST : Astrel’, 2011. 320 p.

4. Vygotsky, L. S. Sobranie sochineniy: v 6 t. T. 5. Osnovy defektologii / L. S. Vygotsky. Moscow : Pedagogika, 1983.

5. Kozlova, K. M. Obzor sposobov al’ternativnoy kommunikatsii, primenyaemykh v otechestvennoy praktike spetsial’nogo obrazovaniya / K. M. Ko-zlova // Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2018. No. 58–4. Tekst : electronic // CyberLeninka. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/obzor-sposobov-alternativnoy-kommunikatsii-primenyaemyh-v-otechestvennoy-praktike-spetsialnogo-obrazovaniya (accessed: 27.02.2026).

6. Luriya, A. R. Travmaticheskaya afaziya: klinika, semiotika i vosstanov-itel’naya terapiya / A. R. Luriya. Moscow : Izdatel’stvo AMN SSSR, 1947.

7. Luriya, A. R. Vosstanovlenie funktsiy mozga posle voennoy travmy / A. R. Luriya. Moscow : Izdatel’stvo AMN SSSR, 1948.

8. Luriya, A. R. Vysshie korkovye funktsii cheloveka i ikh narusheniya pri lokal’nykh porazheniyakh mozga / A. R. Luriya. Moscow : Izdatel’stvo MGU, 1962.

9. Meshcheryakov, A. I. Slepoglukhonemye deti: razvitie psikhiki v protsesse formirovaniya povedeniya / A. I. Meshcheryakov. Moscow : Pedagogika, 1974.

10. Rau, F. F. Metodika obucheniya proiznosheniyu v shkole glukhikh: posobie dlya uchiteley / F. F. Rau, N. F. Slezina. Moscow : Prosveshchenie, 1981.

11. Skorokhodova, O. I. Kak ya vosprinimayu, predstavlyayu i ponimayu okruzhayushchiy mir / O. I. Skorokhodova. Moscow : Pedagogika, 1972.

12. Slezina, N. F. Primenenie tekhnicheskikh sredstv v obuchenii glukhikh proiznosheniyu / N. F. Slezina. Moscow : Pedagogika, 1975.

13. Solov’eva, T. A. Metodicheskie rekomendatsii po ispol’zovaniyu sredstv al’ternativnoy i dopolnitel’noy kommunikatsii v protsesse obucheniya i vospitaniya detey s TMNR / T. A. Solov’eva, M. V. Pereverzeva, S. B. Lazurenko, N. N. Pavlo-va, L. A. Golovchits, T. A. Basilova, A. L. Bitova, T. N. Isaeva, O. V. Karanevskaya, I. A. Filatova. Moscow : IKP, 2023. 85 p.

14. Taptapova, S. L. Vosstanovlenie zvuchnoy rechi u bol’nykh posle rezektsii ili udaleniya gortani / S. L. Taptapova. Moscow : Meditsina, 1985.

15. Tsvetkova, L. S. Afaziya i vosstanovitel’noe obuchenie / L. S. Tsvetko-va. Moscow : Prosveshchenie, 1988.

16. Tsukerman, I. V. Besedy o glukhote i tekhnike, pomogayushchey glu-khim / I. V. Tsukerman. Leningrad : Energiya, 1973.

17. Alm, N. Prediction and conversational momentum in an augmentative communication system / N. Alm, J. L. Arnott, A. F. Newell // Communications of the ACM. 1992. Vol. 35, no. 5. P. 46–57. -https://doi.org/10.1145/129875.129878

18. Baker, B. Minspeak: A semantic compaction system that makes self ex-pression easier for communicatively disabled individuals / B. Baker // Byte. 1982. Vol. 7, no. 9. P. 186–202

19. Beukelman, D. R. Augmentative and alternative communication: Sup-porting children and adults with complex communication needs / D. R. Beukelman, P. Mirenda. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, 2013

20. Carlson, R. A multi-language text-to-speech module / R. Carlson, B. Granström, S. Hunnicutt // Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP ’82). 1982. P. 1604–1607

21. Farwell, L. A. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental pros-thesis utilizing event-related brain potentials / L. A. Farwell, E. Donchin // Electroen-cephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1988. Vol. 70, no. 6. P. 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6

22. Goldstein, H. New method of communication for the aphasic patient / H. Goldstein, H. Cameron // Arizona Medicine. 1952. Vol. 8. P. 17–21

23. Hilgers, F. J. M. A new low-resistance, self-retaining prosthesis (Provox) for voice rehabilitation after total laryngectomy / F. J. M. Hilgers, P. F. Schouwenburg // Laryngoscope. 1990. Vol. 100, no. 11. P. 1202–1207

24. Hourcade, J. A history of augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with severe and profound disabilities / J. Hourcade, T. Pilotte, E. West, P. Parette // Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities. 2004. Vol. 19, no. 4. P. 235–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576040190040501

25. Maling, R. G. Electronic controls for the tetraplegic (P.O.S.M.) / R. G. Maling, D. C. Clarkson //Paraplegia. 1963. Vol. 1. P. 161–174

26. North, D. C. Institutions, institutional change and economic perfor-mance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990

27. Ragin, C. C. The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987

28. Vanderheiden, G. C. A journey through early augmentative communica-tion and computer access / G. C. Vanderheiden // Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2002. Vol. 39, no. 6 (Suppl.). P. 39–54

29. Wilken, E. Sprachförderung bei Kindern mit Down-Syndrom: Mit ausführlicher Darstellung des GuK-Systems / E. Wilken. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 2014

30. Zangari, C. Augmentative and alternative communication: An historic perspective / C. Zangari, L. L. Lloyd, B. Vicker // Augmentative and Alternative Communication. 1994. Vol. 10, no. 1. P. 27–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434619412331276740


Review

For citations:


Shelepin K.V., Naumova D.A., Shelepin E.Y., Skuratova K.S. AUGMENTATIVE AND ALTERNATIVE COMMUNICATION DEVICES: NATIONAL TRAJECTORIES IN XX CENTURY. The Collection of Humanitarian Studies. 2026;(2):35-54. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21626/j-chr/2026-2(47)/4

Views: 39

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2500-3585 (Print)