Formation of a proactive mentoring model in the administration of the Kursk region
https://doi.org/10.21626/j-chr/2025-2(43)/5
Abstract
Relevance. Ahe problem of introducing the institute of mentoring as one of the key methods of adaptation of young government civil servants is not an innovative practice, as N.N. Klishch and V.A. Yanvareva write. Nevertheless, over time, this form of training – mentoring – has proven to be the most effective in the field of professional development and training for government agencies, state corporations, and small and medium-sized businesses. Mentoring practice is associated with a number of issues that reduce its effectiveness and make it difficult for organizations to achieve higher levels of institutional and human development.
The strategic guidelines of the mentoring system require constant adaptation in accordance with the transformations of the institution of civil service, as well as internal structures and organizational changes that occur in specific government agencies. Moreover, it is necessary to adjust the mentoring process, since during the interaction with the mentee, the mentor has the opportunity to better assess his professional strengths and weaknesses, as well as the opportunity to identify additional areas for improving the level of competence.
Purpose. Formation of a proactive mentoring model in the Administration of the Kursk region.
Objectives: to study the conceptual and essential categories of the mentoring phenomenon; to review the goals and objectives of the institute of mentoring in the system of public authorities; to analyze the effectiveness of advanced programs and projects in the field of mentoring (the experience of public and private structures); to study the system of regulatory and legal regulation of mentoring programs in government agencies; to develop an algorithm for mentoring in the Administration of the Kursk region; designing the guidance of a mentor and mentee in the Administration of the Kursk region.
Materials and methods. Theоretical (cоmparisоn, analysis of knоwledge systems, scientific theоries and cоncepts of mentoring) and empirical (study of literature and normative legal acts, retrospective method and forecasting, mоdeling) methods оf scientific research were used in the preparation of the study.
Conclusions. The study of the practice of introducing mentoring in the public service system, both at the federal level and in the regions of Russia, demonstrates the high prospects of this technology in the context of improving the effectiveness of public administration. The expansion of its functional tasks is noted, as well as the active improvement of approaches to the introduction of innovative mechanisms, forms and methods of mentoring
About the Authors
E. M. OrlovaRussian Federation
Elena M. Orlova – Candidate of Sciences in Philosophy, Associate Professor of the Department of State Municipal Administration and Law
Y. P. Snedkova
Russian Federation
Yulia P. Snedkova – Head of the Department of State Municipal Administration and Law, Candidate of Sciences in Economics, Associate Professor
References
1. Goulman D. Emocional'nyj intellekt na rabote = Working with Emotional Intelligence. — M.: «AST», 2009. — 480 s.
2. Gelvi T. Rabota kak vnutrennyaya igra. Raskrytie lichnogo potenciala. — Moskva : Mann, Ivanov i Ferber, 2018. — 304 s.
3. Dammerer, J. T'yutorstvo i kouching kak osobye formy nastavnichestva pri vhozhdenii v professiyu molodyh uchitelej / J. Dammerer, V. Cigler, S. Bartonek // YAroslavskij pedagogicheskij vestnik. – 2019. – № 1(106). – S. 56-69
4. Erofeeva, A. G. Nastavnichestvo, t'yutoring, mentoring, kouching: definitivnyj analiz / A. G. Erofeeva // Doneckie chteniya 2020: obrazovanie, nauka, innovacii, kul'tura i vyzovy sovremennosti: : Materialy V Mezhdunarodnoj nauchnoj konferencii, Doneck, 17–18 noyabrya 2020 goda / Podobshchej redakciej S.V. Bespalovoj. Tom 6. CHast' 1. – Doneck: Izdatel'stvo DonNU, 2020. – S. 43-46.
5. Ignat'eva E. V., Ryabkova YU. V. Issledovanie gotovnosti prepodavatelej universiteta k osushchestvleniyu nastavnicheskoj deyatel'nosti // Perspektivy Nauki i Obrazovaniya. - 2018. -№ 4 (34). - S. 45-51.
6. Klatterbak D. Komandnyj kouching na rabochem meste tekhnologiya sozdaniya samoobuchayushchejsya organizacii / Devid Klatterbak; [per. s angl. YU. S. Titovoj]. — Moskva : Eksmo, 2008. — 282 s.
7. Kemenev, D. A. Nastavnichestvo v sisteme gosudarstvennoj sluzhby Rossijskoj Federacii [Tekst]: monografiya/ D. A. Kemenev. – M.: MAKS Press, 2023. – 300 s.
8. Kemenev, D. A. Principy sovershenstvovaniya kadrovoj tekhnologii nastavnichestva na gosudarstvennoj sluzhbe / D. A. Kemenev // Social'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. – 2019. – № 6. – S. 261-270.
9. Orlova, E. M. Innovacionnyj potencial lichnosti v usloviyah sovremennoj obrazovatel'noj sredy vuza / E. M. Orlova, M. S. Filippovich // Kollekciya gumanitarnyh issledovanij. – 2024. – № 3(40). – S. 63-72.
10. Turkulec N.K. Formirovanie trudovoj motivacii i korporativnogo povedeniya sotrudnikov organizacii po social'no-upravlencheskoj tekhnologii kouchinga: Dis. ... kand. sociol. nauk: 22.00.08 Moskva, 2006 151 s.
11. Seliverstova, M. V. Sravnitel'nyj analiz modelej nastavnichestva v sovremennyh usloviyah / M. V. Seliverstova, D. A. Belyaeva // Mezhdunarodnyj zhurnal gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk. – 2019. – № 3-2. – S. 110-116. – DOI 10.24411/2500-1000-2019-10671. – EDN LIRQDU.
12. Esaulova, I. A. Novye modeli nastavnichestva v praktike obucheniya i razvitiya personala zarubezhnyh kompanij [Tekst] / I. A. Esaulova // Strategii biznesa. – 2017. – № 6 (38). – S. 8-13.
13. Uitmor Dzh. Kouching vysokoj effektivnosti. Novyj stil' menedzhmenta, Razvitie lyudej, Vysokaya effektivnost' = Coaching for Performance: GROWing People, Performance and Purpose. — M.: Mezhdunarodnaya akademiya korporativnogo upravleniya i biznesa, 2005. — 168 s
14. Fridman D, Lison P., Skarbek D. Pravovye sistemy, sil'no nepohozhie na nashu. / Per. angl.: A. Nefedov, D. Kovalenko. — M.: [b. i.] ; CHelyabinsk : Socium, 2024. — 454 s.
15. Falyahov I. I. Diversifikaciya modelej nastavnichestva: mentor, t'yutor, kouch, fasilitator i identifikaciya ih gotovnosti k osushchestvleniyu nastavnicheskoj deyatel'nosti // KPZH. 2016. №2-1 (115). S. 45-49
16. Frolova S. V., Bazarnova N. D. Nastavnichestvo i mentoring: analiz ponyatij // Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya. 2018. №61-2. S. 213-215
17. Filippovich, YU. S. Professional'noe vygoranie: opyt kul'turnofilosofskogo osmysleniya / YU. S. Filippovich // Etyudy kul'tury. Kul'turnyj kod : Materialy Mezhdunarodnoj molodezhnoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii, posvyashchennoj 30-letiyu Instituta iskusstv i kul'tury Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Tomsk, 28–29 noyabrya 2024 goda. – Tomsk: Nacional'nyj issledovatel'skij Tomskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2025. – S. 87-90.
18. Irby, B. J. Editor’s Overview: Mentoring, Tutoring, and Coaching. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. - 2012. - № 20 (3). – Р. 297–301. – URL : https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2012.708186
19. Irby, B. J., Boswell, J., Jeong, S., & Pugliese, E. Editor’s overview: tutoring and coaching. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning. - 2018. - № 26 (3). – Р. 245–248. – URL : https://doi.org/10.1080/13611267.2018.1511955
20. Topping, K.J. The effectiveness of peer tutoring in further and higher education: A typology and review of the literature / K.J. Topping // High Educ. – 1996. - № 32. – Р. 321–345. – URL : https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138870
Review
For citations:
Orlova E.M., Snedkova Y.P. Formation of a proactive mentoring model in the administration of the Kursk region. The Collection of Humanitarian Studies. 2025;(2):51-66. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21626/j-chr/2025-2(43)/5