The potential of the main socio-cultural institutions in the formation and dissemination of the ideologeme of the family
https://doi.org/10.21626/j-chr/2022-3(32)/3
Abstract
The article analyzes the role and place of the main socio-cultural institutions in the formation and spread of the family ideologeme, which allows us to establish that the main institutions of inculturation involved in the formation and spread of the family ideologeme include such paternalistic institutions as education and religion, which ensure the reproduction of the dominant family ideologeme. marriage culture, propaganda institutions in the form of mass media and advertising, which provide a constant targeted impact on the population in order to establish a certain way of family life and behavior in the marriage market, as well as such informal institutions as online communities and the family, which ensure the transmission of life experience in family and marriage sphere from the older generation to the younger, from peers to peers.
About the Authors
E. M. OrlovaRussian Federation
Elena M. Orlova — Candidate of Philosophycal Sciences
305044, 9, Stantsionnaya street, Kursk
Yu. P. Shapovalova
Russian Federation
Yulia P. Shapovalova — Head Department of State, Municipal Administration and Law, Associate Professor, Candidate of Economic Sciences
305044, 9, Stantsionnaya street, Kursk
References
1. Goreva, O.M. Sem’ya kak faktor vliyaniya na stanovlenie lichnosti / O.M. Goreva, L.B. Osipova // Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. - 2015. - № 1-1. - S. 1520-1521.
2. Epifanova, A.I. Reklama kak faktor socializacii molodezhi v transformiruyushchemsya obshchestve / A.I. Epifanova // Social’no-gumanitarnye znaniya. - 2011. - № 7. - S. 166.
3. Efimova, T.V. Internet kak social’nyj institut (k voprosu o metodologii issledovaniya) / T.V. Efimova // V mire nauchnyh otkrytij. - 2014. - № 3-5 (51). - S. 2004-2013.
4. Zakon RF ot 27.12.1991 № 2124-1 «O sredstvah massovoj informacii» [Elektronnyj resurs] / Krnsul’tan-Plyus: Spravochno-pravovaya sistema. - URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_1511/a. (data obrashcheniya 21.01.2021).
5. Kolosova, O.YU. Social’no-kul’turnye instituty: sushchnost’ i tipologiya / O.YU. Kolosova // Sociosfera. - 2014. - № 28. - S. 11-16.
6. Koreckaya, YU.A. Reklama kak agent socializacii molodezhi / YU.A. Koreckaya // Youth World Politic. - 2014. - № 1. - S. 86 - 91.
7. Maklyuen M. Ponimanie Media: vneshnie rasshireniya cheloveka. M.: Giperboreya: Kuchkovo pole, 2007. 462 s.
8. Massovaya informaciya i obshchestvennoe mnenie molodezhi. - Kiev: Nauk. dumka, 1990. - 283 s.
9. Mahiyanova, A.V. Sem’ya kak cennost’ i agent socializacii / A.V. Mahiyanova, L.V. SHeluhanova // Vestnik CHelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. - 2012. - № 18 (272). - S. 44-48.
10. Muhamed, T.V. Postmodernistskie modeli obrazovaniya / T.V. Muhamed // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv. - 2015. - № 4 (66). - S.71-79.
11. Semenov, V.E. Cennostnye orientacii sovremennoj molodezhi / V.E. Semenov // Sociss. - 2007. - № 4. - S. 31 - 40.
12. Sem’evedenie: uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. / L.V. Karceva [i dr.]. - Kazan’: RIC «SHkola», 2015. - 199 s.
13. Fukuyama, F. Velikij razryv / F. Fukuyama. - M.: AST, 2008. – 713 s.
14. Kul’tura sem’i: ucheb. pos.; pod red. N.G. Hramovoj, G.G. Alekseevoj, A.A. Saraevoj, T.A. Altush- kinoj. - M: ASPEKT PRESS, 2009. - 233 s.
15. Hrenkov, V.V. Social’no-destruktivnyj simbioz biznesa i reklamy v rynochnom obshchestve (social’no-filosofskij analiz) / V.V. Hrenkov, V.P. SHalaev // Istoriya, filosofiya, filologiya. - 2016. - № 5 (187). - S. 137 -146.
Review
For citations:
Orlova E.M., Shapovalova Yu.P. The potential of the main socio-cultural institutions in the formation and dissemination of the ideologeme of the family. The Collection of Humanitarian Studies. 2022;(3):26-32. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21626/j-chr/2022-3(32)/3