Cognitive features of effective and ineffective diagnosticians – future educational psychologists
https://doi.org/10.21626/j-chr/2021-4(29)/4
Abstract
The article is devoted to the study of the cognitive characteristics of graduate students - future teachers-psychologists, who at one of the stages of the study were asked to find a solution to psychodiagnostic problems. The success of solving psychodiagnostic tasks made it possible to divide the sample into two groups: “effective” and “ineffective” diagnosticians who had a psychodiagnostic examination of the cognitive sphere. Statistical analysis of the data allowed us to establish that teachers-psychologists with high and low levels of success in solving psychodiagnostic tasks have significant (statistically significant) differences in the cognitive sphere.
About the Authors
E. B. Puchkova
Moscow Pedagogical State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Elena B. Puchkova, Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Labor Psychology and Psychological Counseling
119991, Moscow, Malaya Pirogovskaya str., 1, p. 1
Yu. V. Sukhovershina
Moscow Pedagogical State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Yulia V. Sukhovershina, Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Labor Psychology and Psychological Counseling
119991, Moscow, Malaya Pirogovskaya str., 1, p. 1
References
1. Anufriev A.F. Uspeshnost’ diagnosticheskoi deyatel’nosti pedagoga-psikhologa i ego psikhologicheskie osobennosti / A.F. Anufriev, V.I. Chmel’ // Sovremennoe obrazovanie: problemy i perspektivy : materialy Vseros. nauch.-prakt. konf. (Cheboksary, 9 noyab. 2021 g.) / redkol.: O.N. Shirokov [i dr.] – Cheboksary: TsNS «Interaktiv plyus», 2021. – S. 21-24. – ISBN 978-5-6047220-1-5. doi:10.21661/r-555234
2. Anufriev A.F. Nauchnye osnovy psikhodiagnostiki: dva podkhoda // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta im. M.A. Sholokhova. Pedagogika i psikhologiya. 2010. № 3. S. 4-13.
3. Anufriev A.F., Chmel’ V.I. Razvitie diagnosticheskogo myshleniya: keisy iz praktiki psikhologa. – M.: Izdatel’stvo: Moskovskii pedagogicheskii gosudarstvennyi universitet (Moskva), 2018. S. 176.
4. Karpov A.V. Refleksivnost’ kak psikhicheskoe svoistvo i metodiki ee diagnostiki. Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2003. T. 24. № 5. S. 45–57.
5. Kornilova T. V., Razvalyaeva A. Yu. Aprobatsiya russkoyazychnogo varianta polnogo oprosnika S. Epstaina «Ratsional’nyi-Opytnyi» (Rational-Experiential Inventory)// Psikhologicheskii zhurnal, 2017: tom 38, № 3, s. 92-107.
6. Kornilova T.V. Mel’burnskii oprosnik prinyatiya reshenii: russkoyazychnaya adaptatsiya // Psikhologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. T. 6, № 31. S. 4. URL: http://psystudy.ru (data obrashcheniya: 20.12.2021).
7. Kornilova T.V., Chumakova M.A. Shkaly tolerantnosti i intolerantnosti k neopredelennosti v modifikatsii oprosnika S. Badnera // Eksperimental’naya psikhologiya. 2014. № 1. S. 92-110.
8. Professional’nyi standart «Pedagog-psikholog (psikholog v sfere obrazovaniya)». URL: https://base.garant.ru/71166760/ (data obrashcheniya: 20.12.2021).
9. Kholodnaya M.A. Kognitivnye stili. O prirode individual’nogo uma. 2-e izd. – SPb.: Piter, 2004.- 384 s.
Review
For citations:
Puchkova E.B., Sukhovershina Yu.V. Cognitive features of effective and ineffective diagnosticians – future educational psychologists. The Collection of Humanitarian Studies. 2021;(4):28-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21626/j-chr/2021-4(29)/4
Views:
405
Email this article 